🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold action to ban social platforms access for young people below 16 is sending ripples internationally. Politicians, child protection groups, and families are observing with great interest to see if this tactic will set a precedent for other nations.

The European Trend

Across Europe, a increasing group of countries are considering similar bans.

• Denmark plans a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the PM declaring that mobile devices and apps are "robbing our kids' innocence". A law may be enacted in the coming year.
• Norway is preparing to enforce a age restriction of 15, citing the need to shield the young from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• Ireland is developing a digital wallet to confirm the age and identity of social media participants. The media minister have indicated that an Australia-style ban is "an tools on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has asked the legislature to pass a bill increasing the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a similar move, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in The Netherlands has advised parents to prevent their children from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has approved a symbolic resolution supporting a ban for under-16s unless parental consent is provided. While it highlights of the "addictive" quality of these apps, the step does not establish mandatory rules.

"A strong age barrier is a good first step," stated one European lawmaker driving the initiative.

The UK: A Watchful Approach

In the UK, the government has kept open a potential ban, emphasizing that "no measure is off the table" but stressing any action must be "based on robust data".

Previously, support built behind a legislative effort to introduce controls on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately weakened. Nonetheless, the administration pledged to conduct more studies the issue.

Advocacy groups have expressed concerns. One foundation founded by the family of a teenager who took her own life after encountering harmful platform posts contends that a blanket age ban could fail to improve online safety and could result in a "dangerous transition" of exposure when users become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a response to the refusal of the social media companies to build tools that are appropriate and age appropriate for children," stated a leading peer.

The United States: A Fragmented Picture

Across America, action is primarily occurring at the regional government level due to national gridlock.

• The state of Utah mandates adult approval for under-18s to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• Florida has passed a measure banning children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has approved a law restricting under-16s to one hour of social media time per day, with any further access requiring parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise introduced bills requiring parental consent for minors to create social media accounts.

Even with bipartisan support and suggestions from some politicians to mimic Australia's path, a nationwide ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Views

Beyond the West, other nations are likewise exploring options.

• The Malaysian government intends to restrict social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the required age for one major platform to 16.

But, international organizations adopt a more nuanced stance. The UN children's agency has cautioned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "might have unintended consequences". The body highlights that social networks can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable children and that government action should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to invest in child safeguards.

Even as this worldwide debate unfolds, the steps of Australia and its followers demonstrate that governments around the world are less and less content to stand by for platforms to self-regulate.